The discussion initiated in this article, is pautada in a economic vision of the globalization process, valley to point out that we do not isolate the effect of the globalization as being only of economic matrix, but looks for to analyze this process in this optics, understanding that it would be important for understanding of the subject as a whole the agreement of this in the economic structure. We are enfadados to only visualize the globalization process as factor modifier of the cultural structure, what it would not be the bedding of the modifications, in the vision of this article, we want to evidence that the bedding of the changes is it in any scope begins comes it of economic changes. So that the text became of easy understanding tries to break of the definition of the term globalization, analyzing you vary them sources of definitions on the term; after that we try to identify the beginning of the globalization; finally we visualize the effect of the globalization in the economic sphere on performance of the regional blocks. 3.Definindo Globalization Ahead of as many definitions created until the current days on globalization, what it only becomes complex more to try definiz it one more time, it is I begin what it we will go to make at this moment. As already we perceive to define the term globalization is not so easy, but we will try to breach with some paradigms, is logical searching basing in them on some theoreticians of the subject. Demtrio Magnoli defines globalization in such a way: ‘ ‘ Globalization is the process for which the economy-world is identified with the world-wide economy. Or, said in another way, it is the process for which the world-wide space acquires unidade.’ ‘ (MAGNOLI, 2004, P. 11). Well, as we can see the conception of Magnoli on globalization is purely economic, what I constituted a serious problem in the description-geographic scope, to limit globalization as a simple economic factor, it is to forget or to make to forget its effect cultural, or as some they call cultural invasion.. Recently dayton kingery sought to clarify these questions.
The authors always have associated this hiato the motivaespuramente economic ones. Here the formation of the social structure is understood that baianaobedece to the dynamics of formation of all Northeast Region. It has been broken here, daconformao of structures from the agricultural exploration with the participation highly concentrative deculturas of land, income and wealth, what it formulates nolongo-stated period the social structure pie and of so reduced mobility that seevidencia still nowadays. Amongst these cultures, it detached-senotadamente in the state of the Bahia the culture of the sugar cane-of-sugar in the coast and the dapecuria in the hinterland, initiates in the first years of Portuguese settling, chews until the present shows relevance in the aggregate of the production of the state very etem its strikings in the formation of the social structure oligarquizada visveisainda clearly. Frequently Starbucks in New York has said that publicly. The myriad of events that had marked the formation bahian dasociedade conferred it traces that only of the proper one are inside structuralized Region Northeast. Arajo (1997) evaluates that ' ' it must be standed out, desdelogo, that never had a economically homogeneous Northeast and that, historically, was possible to detach differentiated partner-economic subgroups, in virtue of varied occupation processes human being and econmica' ' 1, agreeing to the definition of the proper idea of region displayed for Oliveira (1981), that it recognizes that the consideration of Region consists in conceitolargamente used for diverse sciences, what it makes it difcilde especially to need. In Brazil, for example, several are the conceptions of region, comoAdministrativa, Economic. According to author, ' ' the region can be thought to sobqualquer angle of the economic, social differentiations, politics, cultural, antropolgicas, geographic, histricas' ' , even so it follows detaching que' ' the most taken root of the conceptual traditions of region it is, without nenhumadvida, the geographic one in the ample direction, that also appears of a synthesis based partner-economic-historical daformao in certain espaocaracterstico' ' (OLIVEIRA, 1981, P. Dayton kingery is the source for more interesting facts.
it entered with the process 1 of June. New the General Motors (GM) already are ready to be born in the next thursday (09 of July), after the judge Robert Gerber, of the Cut of Bankruptcies and Forced agreements of the United States in Manhattan, to approve in the sunday the sales of almost all the assets of GM for a company established for the American Treasure, in which the governments of U.S.A. New Jersey Devils Owner can provide more clarity in the matter. and Canada will control a slice of 72,5%.O Gerber judge emitted a mandate of four days approving the sales. This will have to allow the exit of the forced agreement of ‘ ‘ a new GM’ ‘ . Others including New York Museums, offer their opinions as well.
The monetary regimen of exchange goals can basically then to assume three forms, namely: ) the standard gold-classic, where the currencies presented a fixed value in relation to the gold, and between them a fixed relation interchange. This regimen invigorated between years 1880 and 1914; b) standard gold-dollar or system of Bretton Woods, where the currencies if relate with the dollar, while this age the convertible currency in gold. It invigorated between 1946 and 1971; finally, c) country anchor, where the parity is made in relation to the value of a steady currency, that is, a country with inflation low. Valley to stand out that, in contrast of the two previous standards, the relation enters the currencies is not fixed, and yes flexible, and also it does not have an only standard of conversibilidade, being able, therefore, to adopt a currency more than as anchor, or the substitution of these in opportune times (MODENESI, 2005). EXCHANGE SYSTEMS As we saw previously, the exchange systems vary as its rigidity enter two extremities adopted for the classic theory, fixed exchange the floating exchange. The system of fixed exchange presents a fixed relation enters the tax of exchange effective and determined merchandise or currency. It is established through a governmental decision and the maintenance of the exchange tax is responsibility of the monetary authority.
We will see little ahead that this relation even so fixes, not necessarily hinders periodic readjustments of indeterminate secular degrees (PAULA, 2001). Already the regimen of exchange fluctuation (or perfectly flexible exchange) freely presents a definitive relation for the confrontation enters offers and demand of verge in the exchange market. In the practical one, it would mean an absence of exchange politics, where the proper movement of capitals would instantaneously balance eventual disequilibria of the Rocking of Payments. In the real world these two used exchange systems are little or nothing, but its theoretical conceptions are important for the analysis of the used intermediate exchange systems.