Who won? The summit hardly culminated Fidel Castro wrote that the great loser of this one was imperialism. Filed under: shimmie horn. This argument is repeated by the chavismo that insists on which it was managed to go towards a peace without it mediates the USA and on the basis of the Colombian excuses. The March crisis has shown the regional isolation of Uribe then until important governments of the zone like Mexico, Brazil, Argentina or Peru was emphatic in questioning the aggression to Ecuador. This situation contrasts with which it had Fujimori in 1992 when it catched the head of the Shining Path. If you are not convinced, visit shimmie horn. Then the republics of the hemisphere (including Cuba) expressed their affection to him (although Fujimori came to make a car-blow). It is obvious that in most of the governments of Latin America there is the vision that is better to go towards a solution to the Central American and not to the Peruvian of the Colombian conflict. This perception occurs so that the average Latin diplomats think that the CRAF is not Footpath, because they are arranged to have a discussion, to make exchanges or to be inserted in the democracy multi-partisan. That many will cry out that the unilateralist theses were defeated, even though guerreristas or pro-Bush, the certain thing is that Uribe has obtained many advances.
Uribe is not interested in an external war reason why to accept the truth (to have penetrated in a neighboring country) is something that has allowed him to avoid a diplomatic stage. Nevertheless, this crisis has fortified him much to Uribe at internal level. For some time its internal popularity grows (getting to have up to 80% of approval in some surveys) and he managed to capitalize much social support with great international march the anti-CRAF of the 4 of March. In this last he even managed to divide his left opposition because the Pole was divided between those who followed the of Bogota’ mayor to march in and whom was against it.
The studies that realise the organisms in charge of the maintenance of the environmental cleaning have determined that the regions and zones which it affects plus the contamination of the water are the following: the rivers Guaire and Tuy the tributary lake of Valencia and rivers the valleys of the rivers Tocuyo and Aroa the rivers Unare, Neveri, Apple orchards, Guarapiche, and its affluents the lake of Maracaibo the coastal waters of south-east of the gulf of Venezuela; as product of petroleum spills, fall of industrial and petrochemical remainders. It insists on to indicate, that in this environmental problem the constant increase of waters served as domestic origin is important, in which there are excess of organic rest, amounts of detergents and other residuals that transform the balance of waters, generating in her contamination that worsens with the presence of microorganisms. All these circumstances cause serious damage. One is due to take into account that the varied animal species and vegetables that are developed in the aquatic habitats are not there for serving simply as adornment, they daily act as of oxidation of waters and to clean them of injurious and strange organisms to that habitat. What it will not be obtained, if by toxic remainders, the fauna and the flora disappear. But the most determining reason for the contamination of waters is the concentration of population in the urban zones. Before this reality the indicated authors ask Like defending to us? To the respect they indicate that to control the negative effects of the contamination of waters she is made necessary to front attack the dangers that it contributes with three specific things but: 1. Programmings and development official with implementation of investigation of the zones but damaged by the contamination and the zones of high-priority attention.
2. Promulgation of laws of environmental protection, like specific legal instruments and the spreading of such laws, to extend the education of the citizenship in the natural resource and environmental conservation.
What makes an entrepreneur? This has been the question that for a long time and in many scopes has been posed. It is inquired on the characteristics that must have a successful entrepreneur and if it is born with those characteristics or they are learned. Every day in the world new and successful entrepreneurs are born. But the question continues, one is born enterprising or becomes entrepreneur? The discussion on this subject does not finish. Some think that it is born enterprising and others think that can be taught (to learn) to be an entrepreneur.
Still more, many enterprising being is similar to being an artist, anyway is due to act. Of some realised surveys one follows that, for some people, an entrepreneur is a leader, with clear objectives, disciplined, competitive and until charismatic. Nevertheless, for other people, an entrepreneur is adventurous, that is always facing risks. What we could say to all this? In some sense, both theories take something of reason. It is verified that the majority of successful entrepreneurs have common some qualities and abilities, which allow them, indeed, to be successful. In this case, these qualities, can be taught. Nevertheless, frequently it seems to be, rather, an inherent force that drives these people to enter the businesses or to prepare itself formally to initiate a race in the businesses, and to develop projects like entrepreneurs.
But what we could say of an entrepreneur, it differentiates that it from the other people? First of all, the entrepreneurs have a vision different from the world surrounds that them. They see it like a system, like an integrated unit, in which they see opportunities continuously. He turns them to this, simultaneously, in constant thinkers, seeing opportunities constantly to undertake a business or a project. He characterizes his desire of triumph, and they become people who still compete against themselves.
Without transpirar against an error, nor being excited and to endiosar themselves against a success. Some contend that Danny Meyer shows great expertise in this. It is difficult. But the unique thing that maintains to us and protects like traders. The rest is totally accessory, the market being 80% psychology (own) and 20% ability, technique and knowledge. Studies have become comparative of the masters that must have to trader and it reached the conclusion that he is comparable to the concentration and capacity to react in fractions of second that have professions of high risk like the aeronautics or military man. The excellent pilots still can be traders without almost knowing nothing markets. A pilot of a local airline commented to me once about which they call Situation Awareness (SA), that is to say brings back to consciousness of the situation that before any unforeseen circumstance in the ship, must react otherwise the outcome immediately can be fatal. This makes reference to the perception and understanding that the pilot must have of the external elements, where the information flow is high and the condition of continuation or interruption of those elements in the time and space can determine a safe flight or a plane crash.
A lack of SA can generate a bad decision and to be translated like human error when a misfortune or plane crash happens. The outcomes generated by the negligences and lack of immediate reaction, are different for each profession. In one the life can be lost, in the other something more than money. Until the next one, Paola Pecora Paola Pecora is international analyst of markets, and is the Publisher in Head of Latinforme.com and Global Value, the report of monthly advising in investments, that aims at investments with strong bullish potential in Wall s$street..
In a country of continent more difficult to emigrate, not is the United States, neither Canada, but Mexico, that has strict the immigration laws the more for that try to settle down themselves in their ground, or wants to visit it. But the restrictions do not run for the rich North Americans and citizens of the EU, who can travel without visa, settle down themselves, buy a beautiful condominium in front of the sea and dedicate themselves to the good life, but for that are worse than the Mexicans and can need work. The double standard of the Mexicans when it is immigration subjects is remarkable. The Mexicans, that criticizes arrogantly – like if they had some right that wants to deport them of the United States if their status is illegal; they do not accept to its cousins of the south nor of tourists. If a South American wants to go of vacations to Cancn, must present/display all document class, that nearly they include the vaccine of the dog, to demonstrate that it is not going away to be, otherwise does not grant the appraised safe-conduct to him. However, the Mexican president admonished to the United States by his laws migratory, when its function is to construct a country that offers to its people conditions of life which they cause that they want to remain and not to go away. Caldern had the brazenness to give a speech before the North American congress, reproaching the new law of immigration of Arizona, and the governing suffered brain damage ones of Washington applauded to him.
Every year the Mexicans celebrate ” 5 of Mayo” , in that they boast themselves to have won a battle to the French army in Puebla in 1862. The celebration is realised only in the United States, in Mexico nobody gives importance him. The commemoration is reason so that some go out California, bordering Texas and other states, with Mexican flags and typical suits.