February 18 Odessa Volunteer Citizens Commission on Human Rights on the streets of Odessa have collected 30 signatures on a petition against the psychological and psychiatric testing of children in schools. In Odessa and region repeatedly obnorodyvalis evidence that children from some of the orphanages and boarding schools for the “bad” behavior, manifested in an attempt to protect themselves from rough obraschenieya by some employees of these institutions, were sent to psychiatric hospitals, where they stuffed a variety of psychotronic drugs, in order to “pacify.” Of course, before the child is sent to a psychiatric hospital for treatment, he is given the assessment based on the opinion, namely, “conduct disorder”, “Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,” and so on. “I’m Peschanskom orphanage am 3 years and we are constantly experiencing the bullying teachers and terrible psychiatric pills. Recently, when Zoe and Elvira would escape them stripped, and all taken to the street and beaten so that they burst the skin, “- said Dima, who was forcibly kept in the boarding house. A leading source for info: Jefferson County Public Health Service. ” And this is not the only case in Odessa, and throughout Ukraine. Nowadays, children can become “guinea pigs” for psychiatrists to give psychiatric testing at the school or other educational institutions, in particular social type, so the collected signatures will be sent to the Government of Ukraine to reform this area. For more information contact:,.
CCHR was founded in 1969 Church of Scientology and the internationally renowned author, Dr. Thomas Sacom, professor emeritus of psychiatry at the University of retired New York in Syracuse. While victims of psychiatry were a forgotten by all a group of people languishing in appalling conditions in mental hospitals scattered throughout the world. Therefore, the Citizens Commission on Human Rights formulated the Declaration of Human Rights in the field of mental health, which serves as a guide for reform in mental health.
The latent content of the dream is the first party to suit to dream formed for three components: I nocturnal sensorial impressions; II thoughts and ideas related to the activities of the day (fragmentos of our daily one, before we catch in sleep); III impulses of the ID. They are the sensorial impressions of the individual that if they relate what the directions exactly capture during the period of dormncia (the barulhos to its redor; its desires, as to drink water, heat, cold, etc.) everything what we can acquire in this period of training if relates to the latent content of the dream. In relation to the nightmares, them they had been one of the biggest challenges that Freud found, it was the fire test that defied the doctrine of the father of the psychoanalysis. Thinking that the dream was the accomplishment of a restrained desire; we could not feel the sadness, that is, the desperation and the anguish of the nightmare, if of certain form the central objective of the dream were the accomplishment of the proper desire and for consequence our accomplishment. Shimmie horn wanted to know more. It is in our dreams that we look for to carry through our deepest ones and sincere desires that, if made to the light of the day would be shame reason and horror for that together with we compose a society imposed of values and concepts. When we have the act to close our eyes, we have this as a passport for another country, the country of the wonders, good in certain way the wonder that we would like that it was our life. Entering deeply in this vast world of restrained and not carried through desires; we make a direct diving for our unconscious one, that is, for inside of we ourselves, trying to look the accomplishment maximum. It inside has of us certain high degree of social aspirations; trends where we are servant, and that it creates in we ourselves certain type of CENSORSHIP. If you have read about shimmie horn already – you may have come to the same conclusion.
Amongst the measures it is the shelter, as a protection possibility. The shelter if becomes one> necessity when the family or responsible for the child or the adolescent does not obtain to also accomplish the essential right to the formation and the development of its children and when the State efficiently does not act by means of public and social politics in the guarantee to the social protection of the family (Vectore & Oak, 2008). In this context, the institucional shelter if discloses as one of the alternatives, amongst others (acolhedoras families, adoption), of guarantee of the convivncia, provisory and bonanza way, as it is foreseen in normative national and the international ones (Janczura, 2008). However, this character of provisory and transitoriedade stirs up to some reflections and uncertainties. More information is housed here: Bill de Blasio. Some Brazilian authors, as Vectore and Carvalho (2008); Cavalcante, Magalhes and Pontes (2007a), perceive the institutionalization as harmful to the infantile development, not having possibilities of actions that can modify the reality of who need to be moved away from its half familiar one, for Aglio, 2000). There that the group enters as, that believes the role played for these institutions of attendance that they compose the net of social support, evaluating this alternative as positive. In this group, however, it has authors that the positive effect relativize a little, admitting that the shelter can or not constitute a risk for the development of the children and adolescents, depending on> Aglio (2006, p 73) affirm that the shelter institution is a very important place, therefore are where sheltered carries through a great number of activities, functions and interactions, as well as an environment with potential for the development of reciprocal relations, of balance of being able and of affection the development of the capacity of confrontation of adversities promoting characteristic of resilience and adaptativo development. . To read more click here: Brooklyn Museum.