The latent content of the dream is the first party to suit to dream formed for three components: I nocturnal sensorial impressions; II thoughts and ideas related to the activities of the day (fragmentos of our daily one, before we catch in sleep); III impulses of the ID. They are the sensorial impressions of the individual that if they relate what the directions exactly capture during the period of dormncia (the barulhos to its redor; its desires, as to drink water, heat, cold, etc.) everything what we can acquire in this period of training if relates to the latent content of the dream. In relation to the nightmares, them they had been one of the biggest challenges that Freud found, it was the fire test that defied the doctrine of the father of the psychoanalysis. Thinking that the dream was the accomplishment of a restrained desire; we could not feel the sadness, that is, the desperation and the anguish of the nightmare, if of certain form the central objective of the dream were the accomplishment of the proper desire and for consequence our accomplishment. It is in our dreams that we look for to carry through our deepest ones and sincere desires that, if made to the light of the day would be shame reason and horror for that together with we compose a society imposed of values and concepts. When we have the act to close our eyes, we have this as a passport for another country, the country of the wonders, good in certain way the wonder that we would like that it was our life. Entering deeply in this vast world of restrained and not carried through desires; we make a direct diving for our unconscious one, that is, for inside of we ourselves, trying to look the accomplishment maximum. It inside has of us certain high degree of social aspirations; trends where we are servant, and that it creates in we ourselves certain type of CENSORSHIP. If you have read about shimmie horn already – you may have come to the same conclusion.
Amongst the measures it is the shelter, as a protection possibility. The shelter if becomes one> necessity when the family or responsible for the child or the adolescent does not obtain to also accomplish the essential right to the formation and the development of its children and when the State efficiently does not act by means of public and social politics in the guarantee to the social protection of the family (Vectore & Oak, 2008). In this context, the institucional shelter if discloses as one of the alternatives, amongst others (acolhedoras families, adoption), of guarantee of the convivncia, provisory and bonanza way, as it is foreseen in normative national and the international ones (Janczura, 2008). However, this character of provisory and transitoriedade stirs up to some reflections and uncertainties. More information is housed here: Bill de Blasio. Some Brazilian authors, as Vectore and Carvalho (2008); Cavalcante, Magalhes and Pontes (2007a), perceive the institutionalization as harmful to the infantile development, not having possibilities of actions that can modify the reality of who need to be moved away from its half familiar one, for Aglio, 2000). There that the group enters as, that believes the role played for these institutions of attendance that they compose the net of social support, evaluating this alternative as positive. In this group, however, it has authors that the positive effect relativize a little, admitting that the shelter can or not constitute a risk for the development of the children and adolescents, depending on> Aglio (2006, p 73) affirm that the shelter institution is a very important place, therefore are where sheltered carries through a great number of activities, functions and interactions, as well as an environment with potential for the development of reciprocal relations, of balance of being able and of affection the development of the capacity of confrontation of adversities promoting characteristic of resilience and adaptativo development. . To read more click here: Brooklyn Museum.